In The
Economist's leader this week on the sex business only two kinds of people
are mentioned as being opposed to prostitution: puritans, "who think that
women selling sex are sinners," and do-gooders, "who think they are
victims." I would add a third
category: teachers, who think that prostitutes are children. In the sense that they are
under-educated.
You understand that I regard
anybody who doesn't know the literature his civilization has produced, as
under-educated. A student who has
taken only science and engineering courses is under-educated.
What those students are missing by not taking those
humanities courses, and what literature courses will best give them, is what
prostitutes most need: a dramatized view of life as a whole.
Drama.
How do you get drama that gives you a sense of the whole of life? By looking at death. The end. While you're right in the middle of life.
Oh, did the poets I taught ever do that! First in the middle, the joy. "There it is, oh golden, golden,
there it is, seize it, seize it," and then "Gone, gone, gone forever,
as it will all go." Carpe diem, then ubi sunt, in the terms given us by the Roman poets.
But poets in any period do that, arousing you to the
intensity of physical love and then sticking you with finality of physical
death. If you don't seize the
love, the joy, when you're able to, you'll lose your chance. At the end you'll die deprived, and in
between time, if Milton is right, you'll suffer the little deaths of a deprived
(he would say "depraved") mechanism, an inability to seize, seize all
that's there, together. Because
you (I'm including the client now) wasted your abilities on a part, in a
childish seizure, "loveless, joyless, unindeared."
So, children, know the whole, glimpse the human
future, and you'll be less likely to lie with the "cold-hearted witch,/
And after, drained dry,/ Come to the chamber where/ Lies one long sought with
despair." Yeats knows
that, for most of us, there will be a period when we can't help looking back.
That looking back. Is there a way to make it less regretful? Yes, if you have produced children, a
family, grandchildren, the "large posterity" that Spenser saw
possessing the earth, all the product of the "wedded love" that
Milton saw driving "adulterous lust" to range "among the bestial
herds." Physical love viewed
in the fullest context.
Awareness of that context, however dim, must be what
makes Christmas the saddest day of the whorehouse year. Family, family, reminders
everywhere. Polly Adler's book, A House is Not a Home, told us about it.
There were more victims then, the forced, to whom
none of this applies. Now, with
prostitutes able to charge $250 an hour (recently $350) there are fewer.
It's the people with the choice who need the
drama. Some, of course, have the
imagination to provide it on their own.
But they won't get it from the True
Romance magazines that, Adler says, litter the whores' private quarters.
However you get the drama, though, you can easily
lose it, lose your sense that something important in human life is at stake.
How, reader responsive to literature and art, do you lose that? By becoming a scientist (you think), a
clinician, a Kinsey, or an aloof Economist
writer too cool to see prostitutes as anything but "workers."
No comments:
Post a Comment