"I don't want to do anything with Benjamin
Netanyahu. He does what his God
wants. That's the worst reason in
the world to do something in foreign affairs or politics."
What do you mean 'his God wants'? He never mentions God. He never appeals to him.
"No, but he's the head of the God party, the
party that believes that the land in dispute over there is theirs because God
gave it to them. Question any
decision, propose any compromise, soften any action, and there they are: God
wants it this way. Can you imagine
any party more difficult to deal with at a negotiating table? I mean outside of the Party of God on
the other side — the party of a different God."
No Israeli premier, including members of the
opposing party, has cut back settlements.
Can they all have been God-people?
"If they're not how do you explain their
actions? They're either God-people
or afraid of God-people. They
serve them. What's the
negotiating-table difference? If
you act as a duck you should be dealt with as a duck."
I agree.
But this is one duck I have to stand alongside of. If it's a matter of denying Iran
nuclear weapons I'm right there.
I can't let a country that says it hates us, calls us "the Great
Satan," wants to wipe out our closest ally, and whose culture weakens (by
elevating martyrdom) all normal deterrence, I can't let that country have a
weapon that can do such substantial damage.
"Yet you have stood by and watched them sponsor
or approve of many terrorist acts."
Terrorist acts do not do substantial damage. They do symbolic damage, image
damage. Add up the number of
deaths they cause compared to what World War II caused and you'll see what I
mean by "substantial." 5,000
died at Iwo Jima in five days, 19,000 at the Bulge in two weeks. The Russians in two weeks lost 57,000
at the Battle of Kursk. An A-bomb
raises Iran's capability to that level.
"So to prevent that you will stand by Netanyahu
doing just what all the God people in Israel are doing. You'll be saying, 'God gave them that
land.' Talk about acting like a
duck!"
I know all that, and I know worse. They tricked me into standing beside them. They arranged it so that I had no alternative. By settling themselves, little by
little, in the Occupied Territories, they were able to reach the point where
removing them became a humanitarian outrage. All of my arguments against those God-sanctioned settlements
were negated by what they called "facts on the ground." They moved so gradually I didn't
see it. Now I stand here a fool,
obviously tricked. Yet I have to
stay here.
"I can't believe it. You, a college-educated man, standing with
creationists! Even more
unbelievable is the change in those who tricked you. Aren't they the same people who scoffed at fundamentalists
in the thirties and forties? In my
college days a Jew was somebody who came to your Midwest school from New York
and shot down all the fundamentalists' arguments. I can't believe that these are the people who tricked you
into standing with
fundamentalists. I can't believe they're standing there. How can they be related to the Jews I
knew?"
It doesn't matter. Their identity doesn't matter. Their trickery doesn't matter. Their history doesn't matter. What matters is the prospect of death, in substantial
numbers, for my countrymen and their friends when the big bomb, dropped on or
smuggled into New York, heart of the Great Satan, by an Allah-serving martyr, goes
off. With that in front of me I've
got to draw the red line with Benjamin Netanyahu.
I fully agree, although I didn't know it until I read it. This is such a sensible perspective.
ReplyDeleteGreat to get confirmation that I am meeting the standard of good sense — from one of those in the "breathtakingly sensible" class.
ReplyDelete