The trouble with power is that as
soon as people know you have it they're running to you to settle their
quarrels. You arrive in a nice valley full of farmers, kill the big man in the
castle, and right away you've got a bunch of farmers in your courtyard
boo-hooing about other farmers.
Say you want to be a big man in
the Old Testament. You beat up on this tribe and that tribe and take all the
crescents off the necks of their camels. You've done more with the sword than
any Hebrew hero in years. And where do they put your story? In the book of Judges. You're a damned quarrel-settler.
Go beyond your valley or your
county and it gets worse. Build the biggest navy in the world, bombard your way
into a few continents for their minerals, and what do you get? Not just
minerals. Not just an empire. You get countries
running to you to for quarrel-settlement. You decide on boundaries, you make
rules, you prescribe systems. When the world's geography needs ordering you
give it latitude and longitude.
I know, the assignment is
inevitable. People go to the big power because no matter what judgment they get
from the little power it can be overturned, smack, by the big power. So even if
he's just a dumb jock (like Samson) the big man has to put on the robes, do the
assizes, be the judge.
"But isn't being the big
world power worth it? Getting all those minerals? Getting to make your place
zero longitude?"
Only if you can stand all the
names people call you. "Imperialist." "Aggressor." Besides,
the payoff in minerals changes. In the old days you could just march in and
take somebody's oil. Now there's a world organization with a court and a
publicity system. You'd have the whole universe yelling at you. That's what it
is to be the big power now. All quarrel-settling and damn few minerals.
"I think if I had the power
I'd just sit there and not use it. Except for my own safety. At least I'd have
nobody yelling at me."
A lot you know. People know you have the power. They know you
can smack anybody you want to. And they don't care how dumb a jock you are.
They'll want you to come in and settle quarrels a genius couldn't figure out.
"You mean it takes a genius
to see that innocent people are dying, that a dictator is making war on his own
people, that death by gas is horrible?"
No, it's easy to see those horrors. So
easy that you can't help seeing them on both sides. That's where it gets tough. Which side is committing the most
horrors? The worst? How much worse to count against how many close-to-worst? Suppose you have thirty pretty bad horrors and two downright awful. Sometimes you've got to
be a genius. You're not a genius, you don't go in to end the horrors, and
everybody calls you bad names. "Inhumane." "Immoral." You're in as much
pain not using your power as you were when you used it and got called "an
imperialist."
"Sounds like the only way to
avoid pain is to give up power. But then you'd never have the satisfaction of
seeing a success, a nation with its own quarrel-settling system, democracy, set
up and functioning. That will never happen unless you go in."
Don't talk to me about
satisfaction. I may not be smart but I've lived. I know you can set up a
democratic system that finally, after centuries, gives a people the power their
majority calls for and then, if they're like the Iraqi Shi'ites, they'll throw
their shoes at you. If satisfaction depends on gratitude, forget it.
"So you'll never use your
power to help any Middle Eastern nation set up a democratic government?"
Not unless I get a lot smarter.
Smart enough, anyway, to tell which side in a quarrel has a chance of doing
democracy long term. Smart enough to see a semi- revolution, rather than a
revolution, coming up. The trouble with revolutions, as Robert Frost pointed
out, is that they bring the same kind of people back on top. The trouble with
going in and helping revolutionaries is that you don't know how far they're
going to revolve.
"And if you don't get that
smart you'll what? Give up power? Go back to farming?"
No, I'll go for the power of
example. The greater success our people have in managing their own quarrels the
more the quarreling people of the world will be moved to the same kind of
management in their countries. The power to invade isn't the only kind of power
the United States can use. Think of the number of countries we didn't invade
that became democracies.
No comments:
Post a Comment