"The
educated and affluent enjoy relatively strong, stable families. Everyone else
is more likely to be consigned to unstable, unworkable ones." W. Bradford
Wilcox, associate professor of sociology, U. of Virginia, quoted in NYT
8-17-11.
"Consigned
to," like freight to a shipper, like an embezzler to Sing Sing, like a
soldier to a triage row. "Who
put me in this lousy situation? Certainly not me."
If
you deal with forces, as sociologists do, you can make a correction. "Son,
you should be asking, 'What put me in
this relationship?'" Deprivation, culture, heritage, oppression, anything
but education and affluence will do.
"Consigned"
is one of those removal-words, the thing removed always being personal
responsibility. It does for us what "fate" did for Greeks and
"predestination" did for Christians. Except that it does add
something personal. There's always a hand in sight, signing the commitment
papers, the bill of lading, the diagnosis — all visible in the Latin root, consignare, to put one's seal to.
Not
that a writer can't obscure it, as Wilcox does, with that impersonal passive.
Somebody's signing the sentence that sends you to a life of dysfunction, but
who? Maybe the educated? No, if you name them you've got to argue, out in the
light. Better the dark suggestion. Some kind of — could it be — conspiracy?
No,
suggestions of conspiracy are inappropriate in science. Keep people out.
"Consigned" will do for that. It gives you the impersonal force, it
lets you see a system at work, but it gives it a hand, signing. Something you
can blame, however faintly, and be superior to.
No comments:
Post a Comment