"Marginalized" is a complaint word that carries a
lot of trouble in its root, which calls up a geometric shape, something with a
center and edges. The trouble appears as soon as you get more than one
complaint. How many people or groups can occupy the center? You can't have everybody there. Is there a geometric shape that has no edges, no
periphery? Somebody's got to be out
there on the margin.
The complaint, which readily morphs into reproach and
accusation, comes from those who have been marginalized — blacks, gays,
aboriginal communities, women, handicapped people, the poor, single mothers,
freethinkers, and "dissidents whose ideas and views run against those of
the mainstream" (Wikipedia) — or from those who are sticking up for them.
Whatever the complaint, though, there is clearly a need in
the U.S. for alert complainers. When a person or group is excluded from
meaningful participation in any democratic society those running it — the
electorate, eventually — need to be told, or jabbed.
But we also need to be alert to the way our complaining
words work. Some take us right to the mark and some take us off into space. By
now this one has us wandering beyond Pluto. There are the neo-Nazis over there.
Do we want them at the center? Certainly not. To us they're asteroids and they might
as well know it. To hell with their feelings. So, we're marginalizers. What we've done earns us the name because it exactly fits
what stupid people do to blacks, gays, women, and so on.
We put people in that fix when we adopt a complaint-word
without respect for its reference, to which the root may still be attached.
When the root, like this one, gives you an impossible job of picturing, you are
going to question yourself into spasms. "Remote from power and economic
centers, mountain communities are often marginalized." Remote places are
on the geographical margin. Were they out there and then marginalized? By whom?
Could you marginalize yourself by moving out there? Nah, people don't
marginalize themselves. Not a single example in the Wikipedia entry shows human
agency or responsibility. They are all victims there, acted upon by the center,
and that's the way it's been since sociologists introduced the term.
Follow that with this, another sociologist's example of
marginalization: "Aboriginal communities lost their culture and values
through forced assimilation and lost their rights in society" (Wikipedia).
Assimilation into? They were marginalized by being moved toward the center.
We're in geometrical and logical trouble, whatever the sociology of it.
Apparently, though, many minds can handle this and
"marginalize" has gained popularity as its application has become
more general. By now the meaning "to belittle, depreciate, discount, or
dismiss" has, according to the OED, become "the only meaning of the
word that is used." That pretty well takes the complaint onto the
basketball court. The dominant social group is dissing the others. The others
come back by calling them "bullies," which, according to the OED, is
what the accusation in "marginalize" now amounts to. It's wound up as
a zinger in highbrow trash-talk.
Those who are marginalized are still within the borders. Could we say they are better off than those who are beyond the pale?
ReplyDeleteI need more geometry here, David. Where's that pale? Could you go to the blackboard?
ReplyDelete